Which are better? “Dumb” or Smart phones?
Tehnology is advancing rapidly, and it can be best illustrated by the number of new models of cell phones that appear in the markets every year. However, we can’t be so sure they are much better than their older cousins without detailed analysis.
Truthfacts published a comparative test of “dumb” and smart phones. As a representative of the first was taken Nikia 33 10, which is grappling with iPhone.
As far as resistance to impact, it is clear who is the winner. All who had the old Nokia know that this is indestructible device. The fall from the third floor on the asphalt would require some more search for battery cover, short telephone preparation, little prayer, pressing the button and the screen would be, by some miracle, worked.
In contrast, the smart phone if drop more than a foot on the wooden floor, you must have a lot of luck to pass without consequences.
The software update was not needed for “dumb” phones, but for smart it’s required at least once per week.
Working life is one more point for dumb phones. Many people didn’t throw their old phones because of sentimentality. The best thing is that if they put SIM card and set the phone to a charger, it would turn on automatically.
On the other hand, if the smartphones push out the two years, it could be considered as a success.
When it comes to texting, the old mobile phones are with practiced fingers were able to type in 9 characters per second. It would appear that this is a slam dunk for smart phones, but it’s not much true. How many times have you cursed AutoCorrect Options.
Although the whole test intended as a joke, it can not be denied that a lot of things are right.